Which is a better investment, Gold
or Equity?
India is the world’s
largest consumer of Gold. Indian consumers hold over USD 1 Trillion worth of Gold.
Our fascination for Gold is never ending. Just as a part of an American’s dream
is to own a home, the dream in India is to own as much Gold as possible.
Gold jewellery in
India is considered as wearable wealth, financial security and of course a
fashion statement. India’s love for Gold is as old as its culture! Of late it
also has become a major asset class for investment. So it is important to see
how Gold has fared historically compared to equities.
The chart below
has captured the value of an investment of Rs. 1 lac made in 1978-79 in Gold
and the same amount being invested in the BSE Sensex. The chart throws up
startling facts!
GOLD VS SENSEX
|
|||||||||
From 1979-80 to
2011-12
|
|||||||||
Sl. No.
|
Year
|
Gold
Price (10 grams)
|
Gold
Return %
|
Value
of Rs. 1 lac invested in Gold
|
Sensex
|
Sensex
Return %
|
Value
of Rs. 1 lac invested in Sensex
|
Value
of investment in Sensex minus Gold
|
|
BASE YEAR
|
791
|
|
1,00,000
|
100
|
|
1,00,000
|
|
||
1
|
1979-80
|
1,159
|
46%
|
1,46,451
|
129
|
29%
|
1,29,000
|
-17,451
|
|
2
|
1980-81
|
1,522
|
31%
|
1,92,417
|
173
|
34%
|
1,73,000
|
-19,417
|
|
3
|
1981-82
|
1,719
|
13%
|
2,17,281
|
218
|
26%
|
2,18,000
|
719
|
|
4
|
1982-83
|
1,723
|
0%
|
2,17,707
|
212
|
-3%
|
2,12,000
|
-5,707
|
|
5
|
1983-84
|
1,858
|
8%
|
2,34,887
|
245
|
16%
|
2,45,000
|
10,113
|
|
6
|
1984-85
|
1,984
|
7%
|
2,50,742
|
354
|
44%
|
3,54,000
|
1,03,258
|
|
7
|
1985-86
|
2,125
|
7%
|
2,68,632
|
574
|
62%
|
5,74,000
|
3,05,368
|
|
8
|
1986-87
|
2,323
|
9%
|
2,93,659
|
510
|
-11%
|
5,10,000
|
2,16,341
|
|
9
|
1987-88
|
3,082
|
33%
|
3,89,579
|
398
|
-22%
|
3,98,000
|
8,421
|
|
10
|
1988-89
|
3,175
|
3%
|
4,01,307
|
714
|
79%
|
7,14,000
|
3,12,693
|
|
11
|
1989-90
|
3,229
|
2%
|
4,08,146
|
781
|
9%
|
7,81,000
|
3,72,854
|
|
12
|
1990-91
|
3,452
|
7%
|
4,36,228
|
1,168
|
50%
|
11,68,000
|
7,31,772
|
|
13
|
1991-92
|
4,298
|
25%
|
5,43,165
|
4,285
|
267%
|
42,85,000
|
37,41,835
|
|
14
|
1992-93
|
4,104
|
-5%
|
5,18,650
|
2,281
|
-47%
|
22,81,000
|
17,62,350
|
|
15
|
1993-94
|
4,532
|
10%
|
5,72,770
|
3,779
|
66%
|
37,79,000
|
32,06,230
|
|
16
|
1994-95
|
4,667
|
3%
|
5,89,879
|
3,261
|
-14%
|
32,61,000
|
26,71,121
|
|
17
|
1995-96
|
4,958
|
6%
|
6,26,577
|
3,367
|
3%
|
33,67,000
|
27,40,423
|
|
18
|
1996-97
|
5,071
|
2%
|
6,40,872
|
3,361
|
0%
|
33,61,000
|
27,20,128
|
|
19
|
1997-98
|
4,347
|
-14%
|
5,49,414
|
3,893
|
16%
|
38,93,000
|
33,43,586
|
|
20
|
1998-99
|
4,268
|
-2%
|
5,39,420
|
3,740
|
-4%
|
37,40,000
|
32,00,580
|
|
21
|
1999-00
|
4,394
|
3%
|
5,55,289
|
5,001
|
34%
|
50,01,000
|
44,45,711
|
|
22
|
2000-01
|
4,474
|
2%
|
5,65,405
|
3,604
|
-28%
|
36,04,000
|
30,38,595
|
|
23
|
2001-02
|
4,579
|
2%
|
5,78,742
|
3,469
|
-4%
|
34,69,000
|
28,90,258
|
|
24
|
2002-03
|
5,332
|
16%
|
6,73,942
|
3,049
|
-12%
|
30,49,000
|
23,75,058
|
|
25
|
2003-04
|
5,719
|
7%
|
7,22,801
|
5,591
|
83%
|
55,91,000
|
48,68,199
|
|
26
|
2004-05
|
6,145
|
7%
|
7,76,697
|
6,493
|
16%
|
64,93,000
|
57,16,303
|
|
27
|
2005-06
|
6,901
|
12%
|
8,72,142
|
11,280
|
74%
|
1,12,80,000
|
1,04,07,858
|
|
28
|
2006-07
|
9,240
|
34%
|
11,67,857
|
13,072
|
16%
|
1,30,72,000
|
1,19,04,143
|
|
29
|
2007-08
|
9,996
|
8%
|
12,63,317
|
15,644
|
20%
|
1,56,44,000
|
1,43,80,683
|
|
30
|
2008-09
|
12,890
|
29%
|
16,29,097
|
9,708
|
-38%
|
97,08,000
|
80,78,903
|
|
31
|
2009-10
|
15,756
|
22%
|
19,91,366
|
17,527
|
81%
|
1,75,27,000
|
1,55,35,634
|
|
32
|
2010-11
|
19,227
|
22%
|
24,30,055
|
19,455
|
11%
|
1,94,55,000
|
1,70,24,945
|
|
33
|
2011-12
|
26,520
|
38%
|
33,51,786
|
17,404
|
-11%
|
1,74,04,000
|
1,40,52,214
|
|
CAGR FOR LAST 33
YEARS
|
11.22%
|
|
|
16.92%
|
|
|
|||
Dividend yield (DY)
is not part of the Sensex returns.
|
|||||||||
Assuming only 1%
CAGR of DY, the Sensex CAGR for the last 32 years is
|
17.92%
|
||||||||
As on 31st March
2012
|
|||||||||
Rs.1 Lac invested in Sensex 33 years ago is
Rs.1.74 crore.
|
|||||||||
Rs.1 Lac invested in Gold 33 years ago is
Rs.33.52 lac today.
|
|||||||||
By the way……....Rs.1
Lac kept under your pillow 33 years ago is worth approximately Rs.7,000
today.
|
|||||||||
Historical Data:
The BSE Sensex delivered
an annualized return of 16.92% in the last 33 years (since inception). So Rs.1
lakh invested in Sensex 33 years ago is now around Rs.1.74 crore.
Assuming a
dividend yield of a paltry 1% per annum, the annualized returns work out to
17.92%. Adding the above dividend yield, the corpus would be Rs.2.29 crore.
If a 2 % annual
dividend yield is assumed then the corpus would be Rs. 3.04 crore and a dividend
yield of 3% per annum would have grown the corpus to Rs. 4.00 crore today!
The annualized
rate of return for Gold is 11.22%. So Rs.1 lakh invested in Gold 33 years ago
is worth Rs.33.52 lakhs today.
The Commodity Cycle:
International Gold
prices saw a severe crash for over two decades beginning 1980. In India we did
not feel the impact because rupee depreciated a lot during the same period.
Gold prices fell
from USD 892 per ounce in 1980 to USD 272 in the year 2000. That’s a fall of
around 70% over a 20 year period. Then why were Indian Gold prices Rs. 1,159
(per 10 grams) in 1979-80 and Rs. 4,394 in 1999-2000?
Well, Gold prices
fell 70% but the rupee depreciated by 470% in the same period. So the gain in
the Indian market while prices fell globally was due to the appreciation in the
value of the USD compared to the rupee. This created an illusion that Gold
prices never fall.
Commodities have
longer cycles. On an average a commodity bull market lasts more than a decade
and a commodity bear market lasts nearly two decades. Unlike commodities like Gold
which have longer cycles stock markets usually have shorter cycles. This
creates an illusion that the Gold prices are more stable than the stock markets.
In stock markets the recovery also may be faster but in Gold the recovery may
be longer.
Globally it took
27 years to get the same price for Gold. The highest price reached in 1980 (USD
682 per ounce on 1st October 1980) was again touched only on 15th May 2006.
Zero return for almost 27 years!
Warren Buffett’s view:
Warren Buffett’s annual shareholder
letter is an eagerly anticipated treat for the financial community. An extract
from his letter for 2012 is reproduced below. This gives us a peek into the
mind of the legendary investor’s as far as investment in Gold as an asset class
is concerned.
“The second major category of
investments involves assets that will never produce anything, but that are
purchased in the buyer's hope that someone else -- who also knows that the
assets will be forever unproductive -- will pay more for them in the future.
This type of investment requires an
expanding pool of buyers, who, in turn, are enticed because they believe the
buying pool will expand still further. Owners are not inspired by
what the asset itself can produce -- it will remain lifeless forever -- but
rather by the belief that others will desire it even more avidly in the future.
The major asset in this category is Gold,
currently a huge favourite
of investors who fear almost all other assets, especially paper
money (of whose value, as noted, they are right to be fearful).
Gold, however, has two significant
shortcomings, being neither of much use nor procreative. True, Gold has some
industrial and decorative utility, but the demand for these purposes is both
limited and incapable of soaking up new production.
Meanwhile, if you own one ounce of Gold
for an eternity, you will still own one ounce at its end.
What motivates most Gold purchasers
is their belief that the ranks of the fearful will grow. During the past decade
that belief has proved correct. Beyond that, the rising price has on its own
generated additional buying enthusiasm, attracting purchasers who see the rise
as validating an investment thesis. As "bandwagon" investors join any
party, they create their own truth -- for a while.
Over the past 15 years, both Internet stocks and houses have
demonstrated the extraordinary excesses that can be created by combining an
initially sensible thesis with well-publicized rising prices.
In these bubbles, an army of
originally sceptical investors succumbed to the "proof” delivered by the
market, and the pool of buyers -- for a time -- expanded sufficiently to keep
the bandwagon rolling. But bubbles blown large enough inevitably pop. And then
the old proverb is confirmed once again: "What the wise man does in the
beginning, the fool does in the end."