Monday, 25 June 2012

Which is a better investment, Gold or Equity?


Which is a better investment, Gold or Equity?



India is the world’s largest consumer of Gold. Indian consumers hold over USD 1 Trillion worth of Gold. Our fascination for Gold is never ending. Just as a part of an American’s dream is to own a home, the dream in India is to own as much Gold as possible.

Gold jewellery in India is considered as wearable wealth, financial security and of course a fashion statement. India’s love for Gold is as old as its culture! Of late it also has become a major asset class for investment. So it is important to see how Gold has fared historically compared to equities.

The chart below has captured the value of an investment of Rs. 1 lac made in 1978-79 in Gold and the same amount being invested in the BSE Sensex. The chart throws up startling facts!



GOLD VS SENSEX
From 1979-80 to 2011-12
Sl. No.
Year
Gold Price (10 grams)
Gold Return %
Value of Rs. 1 lac invested in Gold
Sensex
Sensex Return %
Value of Rs. 1 lac invested in Sensex
Value of investment in Sensex minus Gold
BASE YEAR
         791

    1,00,000
      100

            1,00,000

1
1979-80
       1,159
46%
    1,46,451
      129
29%
            1,29,000
        -17,451
2
1980-81
      1,522
31%
    1,92,417
      173
34%
            1,73,000
        -19,417
3
1981-82
       1,719
13%
    2,17,281
      218
26%
            2,18,000
             719
4
1982-83
      1,723
0%
    2,17,707
      212
-3%
            2,12,000
         -5,707
5
1983-84
       1,858
8%
    2,34,887
      245
16%
            2,45,000
        10,113
6
1984-85
       1,984
7%
    2,50,742
      354
44%
            3,54,000
     1,03,258
7
1985-86
      2,125
7%
    2,68,632
      574
62%
            5,74,000
      3,05,368
8
1986-87
      2,323
9%
    2,93,659
      510
-11%
            5,10,000
      2,16,341
9
1987-88
      3,082
33%
    3,89,579
      398
-22%
            3,98,000
          8,421
10
1988-89
       3,175
3%
    4,01,307
      714
79%
            7,14,000
      3,12,693
11
1989-90
      3,229
2%
    4,08,146
      781
9%
            7,81,000
      3,72,854
12
1990-91
      3,452
7%
    4,36,228
   1,168
50%
          11,68,000
      7,31,772
13
1991-92
      4,298
25%
    5,43,165
   4,285
267%
          42,85,000
    37,41,835
14
1992-93
      4,104
-5%
    5,18,650
   2,281
-47%
          22,81,000
    17,62,350
15
1993-94
      4,532
10%
    5,72,770
   3,779
66%
          37,79,000
   32,06,230
16
1994-95
       4,667
3%
    5,89,879
   3,261
-14%
          32,61,000
    26,71,121
17
1995-96
       4,958
6%
    6,26,577
   3,367
3%
          33,67,000
   27,40,423
18
1996-97
      5,071
2%
    6,40,872
   3,361
0%
          33,61,000
   27,20,128
19
1997-98
       4,347
-14%
    5,49,414
   3,893
16%
          38,93,000
    33,43,586
20
1998-99
      4,268
-2%
    5,39,420
   3,740
-4%
          37,40,000
   32,00,580
21
1999-00
       4,394
3%
    5,55,289
   5,001
34%
          50,01,000
    44,45,711
22
2000-01
       4,474
2%
    5,65,405
   3,604
-28%
          36,04,000
    30,38,595
23
2001-02
       4,579
2%
    5,78,742
   3,469
-4%
          34,69,000
   28,90,258
24
2002-03
      5,332
16%
    6,73,942
   3,049
-12%
          30,49,000
    23,75,058
25
2003-04
       5,719
7%
    7,22,801
   5,591
83%
          55,91,000
    48,68,199
26
2004-05
       6,145
7%
    7,76,697
   6,493
16%
          64,93,000
    57,16,303
27
2005-06
      6,901
12%
    8,72,142
 11,280
74%
       1,12,80,000
 1,04,07,858
28
2006-07
      9,240
34%
   11,67,857
 13,072
16%
       1,30,72,000
 1,19,04,143
29
2007-08
       9,996
8%
   12,63,317
  15,644
20%
        1,56,44,000
 1,43,80,683
30
2008-09
    12,890
29%
   16,29,097
   9,708
-38%
          97,08,000
    80,78,903
31
2009-10
     15,756
22%
   19,91,366
 17,527
81%
       1,75,27,000
 1,55,35,634
32
2010-11
    19,227
22%
   24,30,055
  19,455
11%
        1,94,55,000
 1,70,24,945
33
2011-12
    26,520
38%
  33,51,786
 17,404
-11%
      1,74,04,000
 1,40,52,214
CAGR FOR LAST 33 YEARS
11.22%


16.92%


Dividend yield (DY) is not part of the Sensex returns.
Assuming only 1% CAGR of DY, the Sensex CAGR for the last 32 years is
17.92%
As on 31st March 2012
Rs.1 Lac invested in Sensex 33 years ago is Rs.1.74 crore.
Rs.1 Lac invested in Gold 33 years ago is Rs.33.52 lac today.
By the way……....Rs.1 Lac kept under your pillow 33 years ago is worth approximately Rs.7,000 today.



Historical Data:

The BSE Sensex delivered an annualized return of 16.92% in the last 33 years (since inception). So Rs.1 lakh invested in Sensex 33 years ago is now around Rs.1.74 crore.



Assuming a dividend yield of a paltry 1% per annum, the annualized returns work out to 17.92%. Adding the above dividend yield, the corpus would be Rs.2.29 crore.

If a 2 % annual dividend yield is assumed then the corpus would be Rs. 3.04 crore and a dividend yield of 3% per annum would have grown the corpus to Rs. 4.00 crore today!

The annualized rate of return for Gold is 11.22%. So Rs.1 lakh invested in Gold 33 years ago is worth Rs.33.52 lakhs today.

The Commodity Cycle:

International Gold prices saw a severe crash for over two decades beginning 1980. In India we did not feel the impact because rupee depreciated a lot during the same period.

Gold prices fell from USD 892 per ounce in 1980 to USD 272 in the year 2000. That’s a fall of around 70% over a 20 year period. Then why were Indian Gold prices Rs. 1,159 (per 10 grams) in 1979-80 and Rs. 4,394 in 1999-2000?

Well, Gold prices fell 70% but the rupee depreciated by 470% in the same period. So the gain in the Indian market while prices fell globally was due to the appreciation in the value of the USD compared to the rupee. This created an illusion that Gold prices never fall.

Commodities have longer cycles. On an average a commodity bull market lasts more than a decade and a commodity bear market lasts nearly two decades. Unlike commodities like Gold which have longer cycles stock markets usually have shorter cycles. This creates an illusion that the Gold prices are more stable than the stock markets. In stock markets the recovery also may be faster but in Gold the recovery may be longer.

Globally it took 27 years to get the same price for Gold. The highest price reached in 1980 (USD 682 per ounce on 1st October 1980) was again touched only on 15th May 2006. Zero return for almost 27 years!



Warren Buffett’s view:



Warren Buffett’s annual shareholder letter is an eagerly anticipated treat for the financial community. An extract from his letter for 2012 is reproduced below. This gives us a peek into the mind of the legendary investor’s as far as investment in Gold as an asset class is concerned.



“The second major category of investments involves assets that will never produce anything, but that are purchased in the buyer's hope that someone else -- who also knows that the assets will be forever unproductive -- will pay more for them in the future.



This type of investment requires an expanding pool of buyers, who, in turn, are enticed because they believe the buying pool will expand still further. Owners are not inspired by what the asset itself can produce -- it will remain lifeless forever -- but rather by the belief that others will desire it even more avidly in the future.



The major asset in this category is Gold, currently a huge favourite of investors who fear almost all other assets, especially paper money (of whose value, as noted, they are right to be fearful).



Gold, however, has two significant shortcomings, being neither of much use nor procreative. True, Gold has some industrial and decorative utility, but the demand for these purposes is both limited and incapable of soaking up new production.



Meanwhile, if you own one ounce of Gold for an eternity, you will still own one ounce at its end.



What motivates most Gold purchasers is their belief that the ranks of the fearful will grow. During the past decade that belief has proved correct. Beyond that, the rising price has on its own generated additional buying enthusiasm, attracting purchasers who see the rise as validating an investment thesis. As "bandwagon" investors join any party, they create their own truth -- for a while.



Over the past 15 years, both Internet stocks and houses have demonstrated the extraordinary excesses that can be created by combining an initially sensible thesis with well-publicized rising prices.



In these bubbles, an army of originally sceptical investors succumbed to the "proof” delivered by the market, and the pool of buyers -- for a time -- expanded sufficiently to keep the bandwagon rolling. But bubbles blown large enough inevitably pop. And then the old proverb is confirmed once again: "What the wise man does in the beginning, the fool does in the end."